Bullshit Jobs

Wow.  Robert didn’t see this when it came out in 2014.  Now he has a book.

On the Phenomenon of Bullshit Jobs: A Work Rant, David Graeber

To Robert, it seems not quite right, but there is something here which hits a nerve and is correct.  There are what we used to call lower-case J obs.  Which don’t really make their holders feel very good and don’t result in creation of much of anything.  There is also lots of time captured by employers in which employees don’t really do anything at all.  This is all exacerbated by the fact that every worker in the world now has what is essentially a television set on their desk. But Graeber lumps too much together.  Most jobs are not “unnecessary,” regardless of whether they are good jobs.  They would be missed. But not much. For Robert, there seems to be something especially pernicious about jobs in which the primary function of the employee is to organize and move information.  Not create it or anything physical.  This is the 21st century problem. This is the soul-sucking problem that is lurking here.

Excerpt:

“But rather than allowing a massive reduction of working hours to free the world’s population to pursue their own projects, pleasures, visions, and ideas, we have seen the ballooning of not even so much of the ‘service’ sector as of the administrative sector, up to and including the creation of whole new industries like financial services or telemarketing, or the unprecedented expansion of sectors like corporate law, academic and health administration, human resources, and public relations. And these numbers do not even reflect on all those people whose job is to provide administrative, technical, or security support for these industries, or for that matter the whole host of ancillary industries (dog-washers, all-night pizza delivery) that only exist because everyone else is spending so much of their time working in all the other ones.

These are what I propose to call ‘bullshit jobs’.

It’s as if someone were out there making up pointless jobs just for the sake of keeping us all working. And here, precisely, lies the mystery. In capitalism, this is precisely what is not supposed to happen. Sure, in the old inefficient socialist states like the Soviet Union, where employment was considered both a right and a sacred duty, the system made up as many jobs as they had to (this is why in Soviet department stores it took three clerks to sell a piece of meat). But, of course, this is the sort of very problem market competition is supposed to fix. According to economic theory, at least, the last thing a profit-seeking firm is going to do is shell out money to workers they don’t really need to employ. Still, somehow, it happens.”

https://strikemag.org/bullshit-jobs/

Miracle Technologies

Top Three Ways that Working Remotely Through the Internet Allows Middle-Aged Men of Leisure to Continue Participating in the Work Force

#3  –  Spares clients the sight of poor dental work and smell of horrendous coffee breath.

#2 – Obscures the existence of deep sun tan resulting from countless hours on the [choose one or more: golf course / tennis court / sail boat]  “Does this guy ever work?”

Drum Roll Please . . .

#1 – No need for expensive hearing aids.  Just turn up the phone volume!

 

 

 

Current Events

You might ask, “Where does Robert find information and analysis about current events of the day?”

The answer is that he is not a news junkie, but he tries to keep up through email subscriptions to various news and opinion sites. He also takes a look at the New York Times and Los Angeles Times every day (although he usually gives up in disgust after reading few few celebrity white male outrage and wardrobe malfunction stories each day).

He tends to like outlets that publish essays by people who are scientists and experts in a field, and people who have actually held jobs with real responsibility. Journalists, not so much.

Here’s some of what shows up in his in-box.

FiveThirtyEight
Vox
Project Syndicate
National Affairs
Foreign Affairs
The Atlantic
Marginal Revolution

 

Is Marx (not Groucho) Still Relevant?

Is Marx Still Relevant?, Peter Singer, Project Syndicate.

In case you missed it in college (or didn’t understand it, like Robert), here is one more chance to try to understand Marx’s “materialization” of Hegel.

Bottom line concerning Marx’s legacy, according to Singer:  Marx was wrong to think that humans are not self-interested a-holes by nature and he was wrong to think that changing the economic system would result in unbounded productivity. But, to his credit, Marx linked ideas about religion and political institutions to the tools we use to satisfy our needs (and resulting economic structures) in a way that we all now take for granted. Pretty simple. But nice to hear one of the world’s most influential philosophers say it.

Seems to Robert that this is exactly like the way we talk about Freud (which Robert also does not understand). He was totally wrong about penis envy and he set us on a (destructive) side path that has taken 70 years to correct, but on the bright side, we now all know what “subconscious” means when criminal defense attorneys talk about it. Hurrah!